Natalie

D Cup

Member No.: 12055 Posts: 2,225 Joined: 12/2005

▫ Mar 9 2006, 03:55 Post #21

Natalie, this is another place for you to post a lot more pics of your exquisite beauty. :2thumbsup:

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 7542 Posts: 16,209 Joined: 05/2005

▫ Mar 9 2006, 05:39 Post #22

Natalie has nice boobs

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 2922 Posts: 10,702 Joined: 03/2005

▫ Mar 9 2006, 15:51 Post #23

QUOTE(diane26)

Is it ever warm there???

Once our igloos melt for the year, we know it is spring :nahnah:

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 2922 Posts: 10,702 Joined: 03/2005

▫ Mar 9 2006, 15:54 Post #24

QUOTE(Morpheus)

stupid keyboard

The fingers you have used to type are too fat. To obtain a special dialing wand, please mash the keyboard with your palm now. :wink:

QUOTE(bondiguy)

Natalie has nice boobs

I heartily concur!

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 11658 Posts: 21,459 Joined: 11/2005

▫ Mar 9 2006, 22:34 Post #25

QUOTE(belicked6924)

C = 5/9 * (F - 32)
F = 9/5 * (C + 32)
:nahnah:

Let me see, Is this a pointless thread? No! It's Natalie's abd she's definitely hot so she'll let me ramble. :nahnah:

I had a physics teacher in high school that said, "Stop trying to remember two formulas. Simplify the algebraic equation by multipling both sides of the equation by 9.

9* C = 9* 5/9(F - 32)
9C = 5(F - 32)
9C = 5F - 160 <<<This was the formula we were suppose to use on tests, home work, etc.

The test to know whether you have remembered the correct formula is -40C = -40F. It is know as the cross over point where the graphs of the two temperatures intersect.

So let us put this check into Belicks' second equation. I think we will find that the parenthesis don't belong. Belicks' second equation was: F = 9/5 * (C + 32)

First we'll simplify it.

5*F = 5* {9/5 * (C + 32)}
5F = 9*(C+32)
5F = 9C + 288

Now well insert the crossover temperatrue.

5*(-40) = 9(-40) + 288
-200 does not equal -72

If we rewrite Belicks' second equation as F = 9/5 * C + 32.

F = 9/5C + 32
multiply both sides of the equation by 5 to simplify & getrid of the fraction .

5F = 9C + 160

Now insert the crossover temperature of -40

5(-40) = 9(-40) + 160
-200 = -360 + 160
-200 = -200

So the two equations are

C = 5/9 * (F - 32)
F = 9/5 * C + 32

Most chemistry students use calculators so that gets simplified into the decimal fraction of 1.8 instead of 9/5.
The final equation becomes F = 1.8C + 32

Learn the red equation or learn the purple equation or better yet don't bother unless you are really doing research. Then you would probably do it in the metric system anyhow.

The above post (meaning mine not Belicks') is true but alot of pedantic BS! Lets see some lovely breasts. Please Natalie.

▲ Top

Double D's

Member No.: 12556 Posts: 3,164 Joined: 01/2006

▫ Mar 9 2006, 23:53 Post #26

QUOTE(evade20)

Let me see, Is this a pointless thread? No! It's Natalie's abd she's definitely hot so she'll let me ramble. :nahnah:

I had a physics teacher in high school that said, "Stop trying to remember two formulas. Simplify the algebraic equation by multipling both sides of the equation by 9.

9* C = 9* 5/9(F - 32)
9C = 5(F - 32)
9C = 5F - 160 <<<This was the formula we were suppose to use on tests, home work, etc.

The test to know whether you have remembered the correct formula is -40C = -40F. It is know as the cross over point where the graphs of the two temperatures intersect.

So let us put this check into Belicks' second equation. I think we will find that the parenthesis don't belong. Belicks' second equation was: F = 9/5 * (C + 32)

First we'll simplify it.

5*F = 5* {9/5 * (C + 32)}
5F = 9*(C+32)
5F = 9C + 288

Now well insert the crossover temperatrue.

5*(-40) = 9(-40) + 288
-200 does not equal -72

If we rewrite Belicks' second equation as F = 9/5 * C + 32.

F = 9/5C + 32
multiply both sides of the equation by 5 to simplify & getrid of the fraction .

5F = 9C + 160

Now insert the crossover temperature of -40

5(-40) = 9(-40) + 160
-200 = -360 + 160
-200 = -200
So the two equations are

C = 5/9 * (F - 32)
F = 9/5 * C + 32

Most chemistry students use calculators so that gets simplified into the decimal fraction of 1.8 instead of 9/5.
The final equation becomes F = 1.8C + 32

Learn the red equation or learn the purple equation or better yet don't bother unless you are really doing research. Then you would probably do it in the metric system anyhow.
The above post (meaning mine not Belicks') is true but alot of pedantic BS! Lets see some lovely breasts. Please Natalie.

Evade you have way to much time on your hands and you just confuzzled the hell out of me.

In Chem we did it the 5/9 way I only remember that. But anyway all that time to type that you could have looked at boobies :nahnah:

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 11658 Posts: 21,459 Joined: 11/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 01:56 Post #27

QUOTE(diane26)

Evade you have way to much time on your hands and you just confuzzled the hell out of me.
In Chem we did it the 5/9 way I only remember that. But anyway all that time to type that you could have looked at boobies :nahnah:

Converting between F and C is a form of mental masterbation that they use to torture students with

in tests.

But it's rarely if ever used in science. However, if your going to masterbate, you might as well do it right.

Good luck in your Chem classes. :nahnah:

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 11658 Posts: 21,459 Joined: 11/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 01:58 Post #28

QUOTE(bondiguy)

Natalie has nice boobs

Definitely.

▲ Top

Double D's

Member No.: 12556 Posts: 3,164 Joined: 01/2006

▫ Mar 10 2006, 02:52 Post #29

QUOTE(evade20)

Converting between F and C is a form of mental masterbation that they use to torture students with

in tests.

But it's rarely if ever used in science. However, if your going to masterbate, you might as well do it right.

Good luck in your Chem classes. :nahnah:

Well speaking of my Chem Class I know for a fact a AT LEAST got a 95% on my Exam this morning and in the phyisology lab practical I got a 50/50 :woohoo:

Now my brain is fried from all the studying.

▲ Top

D Cup

Member No.: 13587 Posts: 1,642 Joined: 02/2006

▫ Mar 10 2006, 03:08 Post #30

Way to go girl! Now to de-stress and show us your breats.

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 7542 Posts: 16,209 Joined: 05/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 04:39 Post #31

QUOTE(Gnappster)

The fingers you have used to type are too fat. To obtain a special dialing wand, please mash the keyboard with your palm now. :wink:

haha spotted

▲ Top

C Cup

Member No.: 11025 Posts: 638 Joined: 10/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 08:15 Post #32

QUOTE(natalie)

Way to go girl! Now to de-stress and show us your breats.

LOL yes! I love the way this girl thinks!

congrats Diane those are some great results, think the only test I ever took I scored so high on was a drugs test

▲ Top

Double D's

Member No.: 12556 Posts: 3,164 Joined: 01/2006

▫ Mar 10 2006, 08:32 Post #33

QUOTE(Christof)

LOL yes! I love the way this girl thinks!

congrats Diane those are some great results, think the only test I ever took I scored so high on was a drugs test

Everyone knows to stop 30 days prior to knowing you will be taking a test. :rolleyes:

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 7542 Posts: 16,209 Joined: 05/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 10:57 Post #34

QUOTE(diane26)

Everyone knows to stop 30 days prior to knowing you will be taking a test. :rolleyes:

all depending on what drugs u have taken :ph34r:

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 11658 Posts: 21,459 Joined: 11/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 13:17 Post #35

QUOTE(diane26)

Well speaking of my Chem Class I know for a fact a AT LEAST got a 95% on my Exam this morning and in the phyisology lab practical I got a 50/50 :woohoo:

Now my brain is fried from all the studying.

Way to go, Diane. See you didn't need that pesky formula after all. I'll bet Professor P. is a lurker her on RMM.

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 11658 Posts: 21,459 Joined: 11/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 13:17 Post #36

QUOTE(natalie)

Way to go girl! Now to de-stress and show us your breats.

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 2922 Posts: 10,702 Joined: 03/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 16:46 Post #37

QUOTE(evade20)

Let me see, Is this a pointless thread? No! It's Natalie's abd she's definitely hot so she'll let me ramble. :nahnah:

I had a physics teacher in high school that said, "Stop trying to remember two formulas. Simplify the algebraic equation by multipling both sides of the equation by 9.

9* C = 9* 5/9(F - 32)
9C = 5(F - 32)
9C = 5F - 160 <<<This was the formula we were suppose to use on tests, home work, etc.

The test to know whether you have remembered the correct formula is -40C = -40F. It is know as the cross over point where the graphs of the two temperatures intersect.

So let us put this check into Belicks' second equation. I think we will find that the parenthesis don't belong. Belicks' second equation was: F = 9/5 * (C + 32)

First we'll simplify it.

5*F = 5* {9/5 * (C + 32)}
5F = 9*(C+32)
5F = 9C + 288

Now well insert the crossover temperatrue.

5*(-40) = 9(-40) + 288
-200 does not equal -72

If we rewrite Belicks' second equation as F = 9/5 * C + 32.

F = 9/5C + 32
multiply both sides of the equation by 5 to simplify & getrid of the fraction .

5F = 9C + 160

Now insert the crossover temperature of -40

5(-40) = 9(-40) + 160
-200 = -360 + 160
-200 = -200
So the two equations are

C = 5/9 * (F - 32)
F = 9/5 * C + 32

Most chemistry students use calculators so that gets simplified into the decimal fraction of 1.8 instead of 9/5.
The final equation becomes F = 1.8C + 32

Learn the red equation or learn the purple equation or better yet don't bother unless you are really doing research. Then you would probably do it in the metric system anyhow.
The above post (meaning mine not Belicks') is true but alot of pedantic BS! Lets see some lovely breasts. Please Natalie.

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 2922 Posts: 10,702 Joined: 03/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 16:47 Post #38

QUOTE(bondiguy)

all depending on what drugs u have taken :ph34r:

bondi's area of expertise.

▲ Top

D Cup

Member No.: 13587 Posts: 1,642 Joined: 02/2006

▫ Mar 10 2006, 20:17 Post #39

QUOTE(bondiguy)

haha spotted

Damn it!

I kept trying to remember what that was from. I think I need to brush up on my simpsons. y/n?

▲ Top

Melon Master

Member No.: 7542 Posts: 16,209 Joined: 05/2005

▫ Mar 10 2006, 20:29 Post #40

QUOTE(Gnappster)

bondi's area of expertise.

Ah it sure is!

Good to see ur avatar branching out to other matt groening creations! haha

LOL at Tech difficulties

QUOTE(natalie)

Damn it!

I kept trying to remember what that was from. I think I need to brush up on my simpsons. y/n?

You COULD brush up on your simpsons knowledge or you could just concentrate on taking nudie pics for us! I am sure we wont mind you missing the odd simpsons quote

▲ Top